The hijacking of the "Tea Party" movement.

Posted on February 8, 2010 - 5 hours ago

In 2007, the election was looming and the campaign trail was extremely fresh. It was chock full of potential candidates from all walks of the political spectrum but one man rallied everyday citizens to abandon the rhetoric that is modern politics. Ron Paul stood for something more, maybe a time so far gone that few can even fathom a country with limited government. Soon all over the country groups of people started popping up and assembling under one cause. It didn't matter if you were a Democrat, a Republican, or even Green Party, the point was that you were tired of big government's out of control spending and unconstitutional progress. No one really invented this movement but like all famous movements it came into being through need. The need was to hear the cry of American citizens who had enough of Bush's policy and refused to put up with anymore limitless spending, desecration of civil liberties, and interventionist foreign policy. The movement garnered national attention and at one point was branded an anarchist movement which it was absolutely not. A force was being born.

Fast forward to present day and the Tea Party has evolved. We now see an influx of "Obama haters" who might not have the true ideals of the movement in mind. There are a new set of voices infecting a movement that had nothing to do with a more Christian America. A new set of voices infecting the movement that had nothing to do with a black president. The voices belong to the Neo-Conservatives, people who support big government tactics and now are quietly changing their tune to take advantage of something special. Media pundits like Glen Beck have decided to try and hop on a bandwagon that stands against everything he stands for. Sarah Palin has somehow, thanks to the media, become a de-facto leader to a movement that was so far removed from her Christian conservative ideals, a year ago she would have been booed off the stage. The movement is slowly turning into a re-branding for the Republican party and that is horrible. There are now so many voices for special interest that we can no longer discern what the Tea Party really means. There are so many different versions of it that no one knows who or what to support. Once again the Libertarian movement has been sabotaged and hijacked in the name of "Republican Conservatism". People like Ron Paul have been replaced with Sarah Palin and John McCain. Libertarian values have been hijacked and replaced with the same old conservative rhetoric.

So what to do about nothing I suppose? The truth is the powers that be will destroy everything the Tea Party meant. Where once there was a call for limited government powers and a stable monetary system we now have a cry to "destroy terrorism" and signs of Barack Obama dressed as Hitler. Everything that once was has now ceased to be and those who understand civil liberty, limited government, and sound money have to go back to the drawing board. Neo-Conservatives will parlay these grassroots movement into a force to sneak puppets into governmental positions. The biggest loser is the American citizen. You see originally it never mattered what political party you supported, but now it does. My advice, follow men you know won't re-brand themselves at every turn. Men like Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, Rand Paul, Lew Rockwell, and so on. Socialism is coming to America, and all that matters to the Democrats and Republicans is who gets to celebrate when it arrives.

As for the great new leader of the "party"... she can't deliver a speech without writing a cheat sheet on her hand. Is this 9th grade history class? Give me a break. We want leaders, not actors or puppets.

Filed under  //  corporatism   libertarian   palin   peter schiff   ron paul   tea party  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

Apple iPad hoopla fails to convince buyers.

Posted on February 7, 2010 -1 day ago

I said it before it ever dropped and I will continue to keep the opinion. At least for now the iPad seems like it might bomb. The unit itself lacks things like multitasking and a camera. Everything you can do on an iPad you can do on any laptop or computer and probably do it better. Apple is saying that this is the most advanced technology to date but really it isn't. It is a large iPod Touch.

Thanks to retrevo.com we have a nice little graphic that shows the declining interest in the iPad. One would assume that if there aren't major changes before the launch in March Apple might be disappointed with the market response. My take on it? Add a camera (front facing), add multi-tasking, and a more in depth OS. Most importantly adjust the pricing. $500 for 16GB of storage with no accessible file system leaves much to be desired. For $200 you can go to Best Buy, grab ANY Netbook, throw MacOSX on it and have a sick little Hackintosh that does everything the iPad does and more.

Filed under  //  apple   ipad   netbook   opinion   tablet  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

A simple flowchart to find your major.

Posted on February 6, 2010 -2 days ago

Filed under  //  college   flowchart   image   major  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

Big government and big business means big problems.

Posted on February 4, 2010 -4 days ago

The Supreme Court has now allowed corporations to fund candidates for public office. This more or less means giant companies can in effect run for specific seats in the house and senate. Without a strong currency backed by commodity we are doomed to be controlled by big business. We now live in a corporatism where business and government call the shots. The Federal Reserve has a monopoly on money creation thus we have no defense against these financial and political atrocities.

Anyway, after hearing the news (which most news networks won't report) I saw this picture and it inspired the rant.

Filed under  //  business   congress   corporatism   politics   scotus   senate  
Comments (4)
Loading mentions Retweet

The Dangers of Keynesian Economics.

Posted on February 1, 2010 -7 days ago

Most people may not know but the base behind the World's current economic system was designed by a gentleman named John Maynard Keynes. Forgetting the fact I consider this man an enemy to the people let's get to the facts. The base of Keynesian Economics is "monetary policy actions by the central bank and fiscal policy actions by the government to stabilize output over the business cycle." [via Wikipedia]. Let's take a look at that for a minute, we see terms like "central bank" and "government to stabilize", all terms that remove power from the citizens and place it ever so easily in the hands of the government. John Keynes believed that all money should be controlled by one central money house or bank, and that the central bank, with government regulation has a say as to what money means, and what money is worth. In one fail swoop he has removed vital market forces and prevented the free market from working. So why is this bad?

Under a Keynesian Economy government has the power to decide value and print money. The natural forces of the free market cannot operate because they are being blocked, chained up if you will. The government and it's central bank decide what a dollar is, what a penny is, and how much they are "worth". Ignoring market forces like supply and demand and commodity based currency they now have a monopoly over money. We are trained from day one to believe that $0.25 is a shiny circle object called a "quarter" and that entitles you to 25 individual reddish brown circles called "pennies". We are trained to believe the value of a quarter is twenty five cents. This could not be further from the truth. Think for a moment, what are you holding in your hand? You are holding a metal, and metal is a commodity. A commodity is valued for whatever reason and therefore has a price. The price of a specific metal depends on the demand and availability. So while most of us might be trained to look at a quarter and say "oh look, twenty five cents!" I look at a quarter and say "oh look, I wonder if its a 1932-1964 quarter?" Again, so what?

The final "so what" and the crux of my argument is this. From 1932-1964 the central bank and the US Mint made quarters out of silver (as they should!). They pressed the coins and stamped $0.25 on them. So the invented and government controlled Keynesian value will lead you to believe that this quarter no matter what the market says, is worth $0.25 cents. However the truth of the matter is silver is worth something. It is a commodity! The true value of a quarter from 1932-64 is in fact $2.93! Why? Because you have $2.93 worth of silver in your hands if you melt it down. So because of central planning and government controlling money through the central bank you can't even get a stick of gum for a quarter in a Keynesian system! However the truth to the matter is you can actually afford gum and a soda! Are we beginning to see the problem with our global economic system? To prevent people from obtaining real worth the government has phased out silver and gold from our currency and in its place we have zinc, copper, and nickel. Very abundant metals that have little value. Taking this into consideration, the average quarter you have in your pants pocket is actually worth about $0.04 cents! That's right, you have something marked "25 cents" and its true value is a little over .4 cents. How can this be legal? Isn't that fraud? These are the evils of inflation and non commodity based currency. Beyond that aren't we now destroying the value of something we are paying for? I think so!

And lest we forget paper? What is a dollar really worth? After all its really just a rectangular piece of paper made up of cotton and linen. So what is that much cotton and linen worth? The average citizen believes it to be 100 pennies for $1 dollar. I'll tell you the truth though.. it's 6 cents. That's right 6 cents, that much paper is valued at just 6 cents! Makes you think right? And these same papers have values like $20, $50, and $100 on them. The SAME piece of paper valued at just $0.06! Yet because of Keynesianism we don't deal in real values dictated by the market, we deal in fantasy. Artificial interest rates and the uncontrolled printing of money plagues us everyday. This is beginning to sound like a form of counterfeiting. As a matter of fact that is exactly what it is.

Until we bring back a commodity based currency and eliminate things like hyper-inflation, made up values, and prices we are doomed to watch our country and economy destroy itself. We will continue this boom and bust business cycle and only watch as prices skyrocket. The more you have of something the less valuable it is by nature. Ask eastern European countries of the 1920's and 30's. Ask Zimbabwe! All of these countries printed money out of control with no backing or value and soon all it was good for was kindling to sustain fires to keep warm. You must have a check on the value of money and that check must be a commodity valued by the people. Gold, silver, copper, iron, whatever the case it must equal the amount of cash in circulation. It is because of the instability and uncertainty that we see gold and silver prices shooting to the moon and it is my prediction that they will rise even higher. These metals have value, fiat money printed at an uncontrolled rate and given value by central planners cannot hold these same values by nature.

And this is just ANOTHER reason to end the Federal Reserve.

Filed under  //  article   Austrian   economy   Keynesian   money   value  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

Before they were "too big to fail".

Posted on January 25, 2010 -14 days ago

Nice little graph to show you where banking went from the 90's to now. Where the Government sees "too big to fail", I see "not good enough to exist without Government support". Let's hope that the next time the market tries to naturally straighten itself out and correct the toxicity, Government won't interfere and prevent nature from taking its course.

Filed under  //  banking   government   graphs   intervention   money   monopoly  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

The Senate and the drama that is Massachusetts.

Posted on January 19, 2010 -19 days ago

As I'm sure everyone knows last night Scott Brown became the first Republican Senator in Massachusetts since 1972. He is now being praised as the man who can effectively bury Obamacare. Conservatives have a champion and progressive liberals have someone to blame for the possible defeat of the Senate Health Care Bill. The news networks have spent the entire night talking about this man and his impact. A man, who to be fair did break some ground. Massachusetts is consistently a democratic state and to see the people elect a Republican is something no one expected. However the real question is what's the difference?

For too long Republicans and Democrats have had a monopoly on American politics. No matter who sits in the seat it's all the same garbage one after another. Big Government spending from the big government party. Sure this election might enable the Republicans to hinder the passing of Obamacare but it will eventually just be recycled into another government program put together by the Republicans. These programs aren't much different because the parties aren't much different. We can't afford these agendas! They cause rapid inflation of our money, and worst of all they are unconstitutional! The only difference between a possible "Palincare" and Obamacare will be what party gets to celebrate when it's signed into law. These parties are two sides to the same coin. There is no lesser of two evils, because there is no lesser. It's not Democrat and Republican - it's just Republicrat!

To put it properly I will give you a quote from the Honorable Judge Andrew Napolitano:

We do not have two political parties in this country, America. We have one party; called the Big Government Party. The Republican wing likes deficits, war, and assaults on civil liberties. The Democratic wing likes wealth transfer, taxes, and assaults on commercial liberties. Both parties like power; and neither is interested in your freedoms. Think about it. Government is the negation of freedom. Freedom is your power and ability to follow your own free will and your own conscience. The government wants you to follow the will of some faceless bureaucrat.

So which one is it people? Do you want your civil liberties destroyed? Or, do you want your commercial liberties trampled? It's high time we stop looking at face values. I for one am tired of hearing about candidates being elected because "they speak well" or because "they seem like a natural leader". Let's start with addressing the issues. Scott Brown voted for socialized medicine in Massachusetts but now is against the Obama plan? It doesn't make sense! He also supports sending more troops into Afghanistan. Another big government move to occupy and bring democracy to places that don't call for intervention. This is not a Democrat or Republican issue my friends. This is a people issue and it's time we all educate ourselves and take a stand. These parties have no vested interest in your interests!

Filed under  //  democrats   government   liberty   massachusetts   politics   republicans   scott brown  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

Apple Tablet Visual Rumour Roundup

Posted on January 13, 2010 -26 days ago

via geekologie.com (click to enlarge)

I still don't see what anyone would really need this for. Chances are though in a few months I will end up wanting one. I do think it has a market in colleges with text book replacement. I dig my iPhone though - it does everything I need. Do I really need this if Apple updates the iPhone even more? Possible UI updates and a new home screen... I would be happy!

Filed under  //  apple   iphone   islate   leaked   rumour   tablet  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

The Anti-Fed Fact Sheet

Posted on January 9, 2010 - 1 month ago

A nice fact sheet about the Federal Reserve. These masters of money in the Federal Reserve are THE problem with the country. This goes far beyond any sort of Democrat v. Republican issue. Those aren't the issues. The issue is your "money" is worthless. More specifically it is only given a value by the government and not the free market.

We have abandoned the gold standard and now trade pieces of printed paper with no commodity backing them for our goods and services. The paper money is manipulated by the fed and printed at will, thus lowering the value of all other currency in circulation.

"When you act as if money grows on trees, soon it takes on the valuation of leaves." --RP

Filed under  //  economics   economy   federal reserve   free-market   gold standard   politics  
Comments (0)
Loading mentions Retweet

Am I really that popular or is Posterous playing games?

Posted on January 8, 2010 - 1 month ago

Over the last few weeks it would seem as if I have grown in popularity at an exponential level! I went into my control panel to check out the amount of page views I have been receiving and to my surprise they have doubled! This is good news pending it is legit. I double checked with my brother and he too has seen a large jump in his viewers. Could this be that we are getting some extra exposure? I have a feeling that there is some unseen force of nature at work here, I can't figure out what though.

Anyway, has anyone else had these issues... hmm, maybe gifts? I would be thrilled if you left a comment!

Filed under  //  error   popularity   posterous   stats  
Comment (1)
Loading mentions Retweet