The Enemy of the State

“The greatest danger to the State is independent intellectual criticism.”
– Murray N. Rothbard.

Today, rather than celebrate independence, I choose to honor the true enemy of the state Murray N. Rothbard. His Anarcho-Capitalist system of a stateless society dictated by market forces, and protected by a simple code that no individual has a right to aggress against another’s person or property spawned a revolution.

Before his death in 1995 Murray Rothbard was considered by some to be the most dangerous man on the planet, a true honor. This distinction was not rendered from any ability to command an army of violent aggressors, or execute hundreds of thousands of innocent people. This distinction came from his noted brilliance in politics and economics.

A man of character, peace, and integrity he never raised a hand in aggression, never committed an act of violence, never struck a foul blow against any individual. His “crime” was his ability to educate and expose the ills and corruptions of any established State.

To this very day, through his teachings and brilliant contributions the inner workings of any State shake and crumble beneath his pen. A lack of an “independence day” is in honor of his fight against tyranny, Statism, and government coercion. Today I pay tribute to my hero Murray Rothbard.

Rest in peace.

Stopped by FDRadio.com today!

I stopped by FDRadio today for a talk about libertarianism, anarcho-capitalism, and the ills of government and democracy. Give it a listen!

Anyone who would like to talk about it further and get some proper insight (I only had a short amount of time to describe a system that has been written about for many decades, please get at me!)

You can listen to the show at the following link. Thanks to Chris for having me on, big shout out to him and the great work he is doing. FDRadio is moving up fast, support great guys and a great cause.

Link here.

Apple iOS4 Micro-Review

What’s up iOS4! Took a minute but it was worth it. Multitasking and folders are mint.

My brother (because he is on a Mac) was able to update to the iOS4 with iTunes 9.2 installed. I had to wait a bit for 9.2 to hit Windows. Anyone who is savvy enough can now download the Gold Master version of iOS4 and throw it on your phone before the launch date on the 21st.

Mini Review: It’s fantastic. I am not an Apple fanboy and the iPhone is the only Apple product I own but I think that will change soon. The multitasking is flawless and well worth the wait. It doesn’t feel slow or sluggish like an Android. The days of having your AIM or Skype signed on at all times are back with this update. Ex-Sidekick users know what I’m talking about. I finally feel like I have control of my phone’s preferences with the locations updates as well.

I noticed what felt like a small speed jump. One thing is for sure, the Email, and SMS apps are much faster and SMS now includes a nice little character count (nice for anyone who tweets via txt). The camera shows the greatest improvements; pictures snap in lightening speed. No more millisecond wait which would render that unwanted picture blur.

All of the updates and new features leave me with no choice but to give the new iOS4 an A. Not an A+ because that would be perfect and there are a few things I would like to see implemented but I can’t wait to grab hold of a new iPhone 4 when they drop. Great job Apple.

If you want to jump on the bandwagon and update your phone before the 21st; it’s nothing a quick Google search won’t enable. Best of luck.

Update: Added a second screen cap of all of my folders. Makes browsing the phone much nicer without having to scroll 6 pages.

My two cents on the iPhone 4

It was revealed or re-revealed depending on what your particular online news source is. All of the bells and whistles are covered on a million other sites so I won’t waste my time. My purpose is to look at it from a different angle. I think from the unveiling that the iPhone 4 is a home run. So much so that I will end up with one. However it won’t be the day of launch.

I think the phone is an excellent representation of what great engineering can do. Sleek, sexy, and functional with all the neat features like an hd screen, video chat, and proper multitasking. So why not get it on day one? That’s simple, why put myself in a position to be disappointed or fall victim to early adopter blues? With every big launch comes some sort of issue, be it battery, glass, memory, hardware, or whatever. My take is let everyone else get it, play with it for a few days and lets see what the internet has to say once all the hype dies down. I am sure launch will go off without a problem but waiting a few days might be key, that goes for any hyped launch.

Beyond that iOS4 launches on the 21st, so what am I really missing? A better camera? A better screen? Sure these things are really nice but it’s not like I can’t live without them. My 3GS does everything I need it to do, and how many people will I be able to video chat with anyway? Thus far I know one. Yes, my brother, so I’m in no rush. If you asked me the iPhone 4 is what the iPhone should have been right after the 3G. We didn’t and shouldn’t have had a 3GS. However as everyone knows that is just Apple milking the cash cow. Can you blame them? If I had that many fans I’d release half articles and posts.

So there it is, the iPhone 4 looks great, I can’t wait to get one, but not right off the rip. Maybe a week or two deep. I would be so mad if I ran into a bunch of issues at launch and really – who wants to stand in line or deal with the mad hatter fan boys?

BP: Keeping it in Perspective

Update: Pro tip, actually READ the article and not just the first paragraph before you call me names lol! If you come away from this thinking I am advocating BP get away free and clear PLEASE see the entire paragraph dedicated to 100% liability as I make no such claims. As a matter of fact (if you read you would know) 100% liability is FORBIDDEN by the government. LOL! Amateurs.

It has been about a month since the BP “Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill” first shook the headlines of every major news source across the globe. At every turn we have heard about the chaos and destruction that has been caused by this oil spill but not once has anyone talked about the real victim in all of this, BP.

It is very easy to vilify BP for this oil spill. Even our government is advocating we take a hard line on BP. US press secretary, Robert Gibbs, said that the government intended to keep “its boot on BP’s neck.” However what many people fail to realize is this spill is an accident not an act of environmental terrorism. BP is not profiting from this spill. As a matter of fact 11 people lost their lives, where is the media coverage of that?

It is easy to lambast a company when events like this occur, but one must see beyond the media spin. It’s easy to splash some images of birds covered in oil and point a finger at a successful multinational company like BP and let the environmentalists go wild. Let’s keep in mind that BP is losing hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil daily. Their stock prices have plummeted and a company that has provided excellent service for many years to power our lives is at risk of collapsing. This means that small time subcontractors will suffer to feed their families, jobs will be cut, and entire industries will feel the shock as gas and oil prices will shoot sky-high. We rely on oil to live our lives and as such any event like this affects all of us on an economic level. It is because of this that BP is a victim and I feel bad for them. No one in this scenario profits.

Actually that’s not entirely true. It just so happens that environmentalists and government profits the most in these situations. Environmentalists who jump at the bit to berate a company like BP have done the most profiting. They are on all the media networks expressing deep remorse while other members of these groups are lobbying in Washington. Now with a chance to coin this a “disaster” they can leverage to get their agenda through on the hill.

What is this agenda? More regulation, less productivity for companies, a potential ban on offshore drilling, and increased taxes. Their fear mongering will do little to help animals. These companies that put the life of an animal above the life of a human aren’t the least bit concerned with the animals. They want to tell you what to be afraid of, and who you can blame for it; all the while making sure they manage to gain from it. If they have their way oil would be nonexistent. Life would be somewhere in the middle ages and all the good that oil does would be wiped away. This is unacceptable.

The other profiteer is Government. If anyone is to blame it is the government. Setting legislation for limited liability creates moral hazards, much like the TARP bailouts! United States federal law limits BP’s liability for non-cleanup costs to $75 million unless gross negligence is proven. Why isn’t liability 100%? A 100% liability cost would match a companies need to make sure it was doing business as safe and as efficient as possible. Government doesn’t encourage this, it creates a chance for companies to cut corners. Keep in mind that it is also government regulation that forces these companies to dig in deep water to begin with. Government interference prevents more sensible drilling on land or close to shore.

Government also profits because it now has a platform to steal more money in taxes. Without question taxes will be on the rise so bureaucrats who have no idea about oil spills can fund their proposed bills and social programs through “Oil Spill Prevention Acts”. These acts will do nothing to prevent oil spills and everything to assault civil and commercial liberties. There is even talk of ending tax breaks for oil companies. Seems like a nice way to increase the price we pay for oil and drive more companies away from doing business in the United States, really productive ::sarcasm::.

Government meddling with business drives companies out, taxing them into oblivion won’t clean up oil, it will hurt Main St. All of this does one thing and that is hinder the free market. Let free market forces determine the fate of BP, the market will correct this, like everything else. The government can’t sop up oil any faster than private industry can. All government can do is give it a lackluster effort and bill you for the cleanup. If we vote with our money than BP will do whatever it takes to satisfy its investors and customers. Not to mention what private individuals will come up with as a solution.

Let us keep in mind that these events are rare. Government does not need to step in and destroy the American oil industry. We don’t stop buying cars because people get in accidents, we don’t stop flying because a plane goes down, and we don’t need more regulations on the oil industry that will only hurt average everyday Americans at the pump. We need to understand this was a terrible accident, lives were lost, and a company hangs in the balance. The animal life will undoubtedly suffer and that is terrible. Let it be known that I feel for these animals, they did nothing to deserve this. However, it must be noted that government cannot protect them better than free individuals can. This is a true tragedy of the commons.

Finally, BP is not a terrorist organization hell-bent on destroying the American way of life, it is a company trying to turn a profit. Couple that with asinine limited liability  (government intervention) and you are left with what you have today, a company doing what it can to fix the mess it made within its legislated ability. Had the free market been in place this oil spill would have been 100 times less damaging, if it even happened at all.

From Mr. Lew Rockwell Ron Paul’s former Chief of Staff:
The abstraction called the “ecosystem” – which never seems to include humans or their civilization – has done far less for us than the oil industry. So let us not forget that the greatest tragedy here is BP’s and its subsidiaries’ and subcontractors’, and the private enterprises affected by the losses that no one intended. If the result is a shutdown of drilling and further regulation of private enterprise, people will lose. And that is what counts.